<< Note: This is part of an article series that begins here

Type #3 wants to be laid but this man is typically a good person. He’s usually the “friend” who may not be man enough to do anything but watch you go through countless relationships while he wishes he was that person holding you. This man may have had a mother with no father figure, or have had a father present who was absent in some form regarding relationships and the male’s role in them. In other words, he’s not sure how to “be a man”. Of course, you may already know this, and that’s why he’s your FRIEND.

This man is like a hungry begging dog. He’ll sit at the table for as long as he can stand because he knows there is food there and eventually it will fall to his level (in other words, you’ll lower your standards). He thinks that if a girl shows him attention, that he NEEDS to get into a relationship with her. 90% of the time, an actual relationship is NOT what he wants, but he is too stupid to know. As is usually the case, he will start distancing himself or becoming “stranger” over the next few months. You may start to wonder “What happened?”. Eventually you will leave this type of man or you stay as the relationship slowly spirals downhill.

You’ll probably stay with this man way too long, to the point where you’re the one thinking of either leaving or cheating. Partially because “he loves you”, partially because you think he’ll eventually change. That maybe this is a phase. Things were great in the beginning, maybe it’s just you.

This type of man thinks he means the words, “I love you”. However, what he means by “I love you” is “I enjoy being with you and would like to continue having or to start having sex with you”. By saying these words, he flips your magical “potential suitor” switch and often will get you to stay with him. Completely oblivious to him of course. This type of man THINKS he is in love or THINKS he will EVENTUALLY fall in love with you - but he’s mistaken.

Previous education and previous experiences have led type #3 to believe that these 3 words lead to sex, and as a result, his subconcious mind will make him continue to use them - again, oblivious to him. He is powerless to make his own decisions or act upon his instincts because he is unfamiliar territory. Often the woman plays the “alpha” role in this relationship and as such she slowly sucks what she found attractive from the male as he is less and less the authoritarian she was hoping he would grow into being. Remaining true to the idea that women like a man who will listen and be their friend - but will sleep with a man that tells them to shut up and kiss them.

In other words, this man is an moron.

This is type #3, the “good guy”. He wants to get laid and will say I love you as a way to do it. Potentially worse than The Jerk though, he does not use it as ammunition, but rather because he’s lied to himself and told himself that he truly means it.

Introduction
Type Number One - The Jerk
Type Number Two - The Ambitious Man
Type Number Three - The Moron
Conclusion…

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Check Out Some Related Posts

RSS feed | Trackback URI

3 Comments »

2007-04-20 09:38:10

[…] been married for 15 years with a nice wife, nice home, nice job, and nice 6 year old daughter. I considered myself an intelligent guy until I read your description of the Moron, which fits me in …. Prior to marriage I never had what anyone would consider an active sex life, being both picky and […]

 
2007-06-22 11:06:09

[…] necessary to be rewarded… now wants to be smacked… treated rough. The man taught to be The Moron.. Is now being asked to be The […]

 
2008-02-27 00:01:36

[…] much as necessary to be rewarded… now wants to be smacked… treated rough. The man taught to be The Moron.. Is now being asked to be The Jerk! Read […]

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
** If you haven't posted before, your comment may require approval before it is displayed **
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.