<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Three Types of Men - The Ambitious Man</title>
	<link>http://www.askugg.com/2007/03/09/the-three-types-of-men-the-ambitious-man/</link>
	<description>AskUgg.com discusses Cheating, Relationships, Dating, Sex, Intimacy, Infidelity, and more!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: nih</title>
		<link>http://www.askugg.com/2007/03/09/the-three-types-of-men-the-ambitious-man/#comment-254</link>
		<author>nih</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.askugg.com/2007/03/09/the-three-types-of-men-the-ambitious-man/#comment-254</guid>
					<description>That's hilarious how you describe a man's "true desires" as love and monogamy. One page back you describe how all men who want sex are jerks, and how all jerks are men who want sex.

I know you're unlikely to approve this comment, but I hope you read it thoroughly. Why? Because out of all your blog, these three articles are poison.

At the least balance it up with the three kinds of women:

The ones that want marriage and kids but not sex
The ones that use sex initially to get money from you
The ones that pretend they want sex but don't actually put out much

'Cmon, if you can compartmentalise men into three ridiculous definitions, why don't you do the same injustice to women? At least then you'll have balance, if not very credible examples of writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s hilarious how you describe a man&#8217;s &#8220;true desires&#8221; as love and monogamy. One page back you describe how all men who want sex are jerks, and how all jerks are men who want sex.</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;re unlikely to approve this comment, but I hope you read it thoroughly. Why? Because out of all your blog, these three articles are poison.</p>
<p>At the least balance it up with the three kinds of women:</p>
<p>The ones that want marriage and kids but not sex<br />
The ones that use sex initially to get money from you<br />
The ones that pretend they want sex but don&#8217;t actually put out much</p>
<p>&#8216;Cmon, if you can compartmentalise men into three ridiculous definitions, why don&#8217;t you do the same injustice to women? At least then you&#8217;ll have balance, if not very credible examples of writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugg</title>
		<link>http://www.askugg.com/2007/03/09/the-three-types-of-men-the-ambitious-man/#comment-255</link>
		<author>Ugg</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.askugg.com/2007/03/09/the-three-types-of-men-the-ambitious-man/#comment-255</guid>
					<description>Heh, well I had actually planned on a series for women but the biological nurturing aspect of women tend to complicate it a bit.  In nature, the male species releases its seed and then dies.  Humans just found out how to trick the system.

Men want bonding in the end because things get lonely, but men show love through sex so even though men desire love and affection, there has to be sex.  Whether it's with a woman we love each night or it's with a kleenex, men will find release - a successful relationship acknowledges that.

As far as saying men want monogamy... can you point out where I said that?  I believe that monogamy for a man is very hard to achieve satisfactorily.  It's against our biological nature.  Men are designed to spread seed to as many partners as possible in order to perpetuate the species successfully.  Though I believe that as we've evolved that aspect has moved from less of a 'spray and pray' to more of a selection-based basis.

And I don't mind objective comments - they're what make discussions so fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, well I had actually planned on a series for women but the biological nurturing aspect of women tend to complicate it a bit.  In nature, the male species releases its seed and then dies.  Humans just found out how to trick the system.</p>
<p>Men want bonding in the end because things get lonely, but men show love through sex so even though men desire love and affection, there has to be sex.  Whether it&#8217;s with a woman we love each night or it&#8217;s with a kleenex, men will find release - a successful relationship acknowledges that.</p>
<p>As far as saying men want monogamy&#8230; can you point out where I said that?  I believe that monogamy for a man is very hard to achieve satisfactorily.  It&#8217;s against our biological nature.  Men are designed to spread seed to as many partners as possible in order to perpetuate the species successfully.  Though I believe that as we&#8217;ve evolved that aspect has moved from less of a &#8217;spray and pray&#8217; to more of a selection-based basis.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t mind objective comments - they&#8217;re what make discussions so fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugg</title>
		<link>http://www.askugg.com/2007/03/09/the-three-types-of-men-the-ambitious-man/#comment-256</link>
		<author>Ugg</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.askugg.com/2007/03/09/the-three-types-of-men-the-ambitious-man/#comment-256</guid>
					<description>By the way to better answer your objections (got off on a tangent in the other reply):

&lt;i&gt;&lt;strong&gt;That’s hilarious how you describe a man’s “true desires” as love and monogamy. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

To be clear - that wasn't my intention - let me know where that was misconstrued and I'll go back and edit as necessary :)



&lt;i&gt;&lt;strong&gt;One page back you describe how all men who want sex are jerks, and how all jerks are men who want sex.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

"The Jerk" is a type of man.  All men want sex - all of these 3 types do.  Only one of them is a jerk.  The difference between the men is what they do in order to get sex.  The moron is oblivious to what he truly wants, the jerk is only after sex, and the ambitious man is after sex, but not at the expense of treating women like crap.

Ultimately the ambitious man's approach will yield happier sexual relationships.  Monogamous or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way to better answer your objections (got off on a tangent in the other reply):</p>
<p><i><strong>That’s hilarious how you describe a man’s “true desires” as love and monogamy. </strong></i></p>
<p>To be clear - that wasn&#8217;t my intention - let me know where that was misconstrued and I&#8217;ll go back and edit as necessary <img src='http://www.askugg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><i><strong>One page back you describe how all men who want sex are jerks, and how all jerks are men who want sex.</strong></i></p>
<p>&#8220;The Jerk&#8221; is a type of man.  All men want sex - all of these 3 types do.  Only one of them is a jerk.  The difference between the men is what they do in order to get sex.  The moron is oblivious to what he truly wants, the jerk is only after sex, and the ambitious man is after sex, but not at the expense of treating women like crap.</p>
<p>Ultimately the ambitious man&#8217;s approach will yield happier sexual relationships.  Monogamous or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
